Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients https://patientsforfairness.org 46 years is too long. Tue, 20 Dec 2022 17:19:44 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://patientsforfairness.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/cropped-favicon-1-90x90.png Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients https://patientsforfairness.org 32 32 Patricia McMillan https://patientsforfairness.org/patricia-mcmillan/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=patricia-mcmillan Fri, 01 Apr 2022 19:57:47 +0000 https://patientsforfairness.org/?p=17895 Insufficient preventative and post-operative care lead to a severe staph infection in Patricia’s eye, causing permanent blindness.

The post Patricia McMillan appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

Share Patricia’s Story
Facebook Share Button

Patricia McMillan was enjoying her work as a paralegal and looking forward to the arrival of her first grandchild when she was diagnosed with an epiretinal membrane, a common eye condition that can impair vision if left untreated. Her vision was 20/20 with corrective lenses, but she elected to have a routine corrective procedure to prevent potential future impairment. She was encouraged and reassured by her retina surgeon. On the day of the surgery at a renowned eye institute in the San Diego area, Patricia was rushed through pre-op. The surgeon never came by to speak with her. She awoke mid-surgery, terrified, as the anesthesia had not been administered properly. Someone noticed she was awake and held her hand.

After the procedure, she was told the surgery went well. Still affected by the anesthesia, she was barely coherent, but they encouraged her to get dressed and leave.

By evening the next day, Patricia suddenly developed an excruciating headache and eye pain, and began vomiting. Her eye was constantly watering. These symptoms were mentioned in her discharge instructions as serious enough to call the emergency number provided by the optometrist. She called, but the clinic told her that she should wait until her appointment in the morning the next day. She tried to hold out, but the pain was so severe that she decided to go to the emergency room.

In the ER, her eye shield was removed for the first time and she realized that she had no vision in her eye at all, only darkness. After receiving medication for the pain and nausea, she was brought back to her retina surgeon’s clinic, where a sonogram revealed a large amount of debris.

The debris was a severe staph infection. The fellow at the clinic drained her eye and injected an antibiotic to treat it, but the long-term damage to her optic nerve was already done. At the urging of multiple doctors, she agreed to undergo a second, corrective surgery, but it did not help her vision and only put her through weeks more of pain and severe spikes in eye pressure. Scans show that the infection and subsequent spikes in pressure destroyed 75 percent of her optic nerve.

Patricia’s quality of life is greatly affected by her injury: “I cannot see anything clearly with that eye, no matter how close it is. I cannot see to use my iPhone, or see my computer monitors, or read anything. I cannot even see my five-month-old granddaughter’s face. My only grandchild.”

The injury resulted in permanent disability and forced her to leave her job as a paralegal, which she enjoyed and excelled at for many years. Her whole life has been turned upside down.

Meanwhile, her surgeon has showed no sympathy or remorse. Despite many visits back to the clinic, she only ever saw him after she requested to speak with him. He told her “it happens,” with regard to the infection, and said “What do you want me to do? There is nothing else we can do for you,” when she continued asking questions to see if her blindness could be improved. She has never received an apology or acknowledgement of the severity of her injury.

Patricia has spoken with several attorneys, seeking accountability and compensation for what happened to her. However, none will take her case because of California’s outdated $250,000 cap on medical malpractice damages. The surgeon’s lawyer has rejected a pre-litigation settlement, so she will not receive any compensation for her injury.

She supports the Fairness for Injured Patients Act because she wants to prevent something like this from happening to others.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Screen Shot 2021-06-14 at 4.19.44 PM

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Patricia McMillan appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Anonymous R https://patientsforfairness.org/anonymousr/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=anonymousr Sun, 11 Jul 2021 07:14:00 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1106 R.’s glaring symptoms of pneumonia were brushed off until it was too late.

The post Anonymous R appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

J’s mother R was a lawyer and an active member of the Filipino American Veterans Association in Los Angeles. J says that her mother was healthy and alert when one day she began complaining of shortness of breath. 

J, a medical doctor herself, called for an ambulance and accompanied her mother to the Emergency Room of the nearby hospital where her Primary Care Physician worked. R was diagnosed with pneumonia and given antibiotics. When she began to improve, instead of being transferred to the Transitional Care Unit, she was brought to the neighboring Rehabilitation Center where she did physical therapy.

However, R again felt shortness of breath a few days later. Her doctor sent her back to the Emergency Room, where she received a chest x-ray. J never saw the results.

A swallowing evaluation was ordered to rule out aspiration pneumonia. But unbeknownst to J, her mother instead underwent an endoscopy. The procedure was not ordered by R’s doctor and the hospital did not ask R’s permission. J was never told about the test and, again, never saw the results.

At the hospital, R lost a lot of weight. Both the nurse on duty and J notified R’s doctor, but the doctor ignored this cause for concern. R’s doctor wrote an order for her transfer to the Transitional Care Unit. Again, she was denied admittance and sent to the Rehabilitation Center.

Back at the center, R’s shortness of breath returned. She was feverish and sweating a lot. However, the doctor on call only ordered Tylenol for the next several days. R received no antibiotics or other medication despite her continued symptoms of pneumonia.

When R’s doctor finally came to visit her, J informed him that her mother needed more than just Tylenol. She needed antibiotics. A doctor herself, J suspected her mother still had pneumonia. However the doctor said nothing and walked away. J still received no antibiotics.

Two days later, J told the nurse to call an ambulance and take R back to ER. There, she was finally diagnosed with pneumonia and given the medication she needed. The pulmonary specialist came to see her and told J that he would evacuate the fluid form R’s lungs the next day “if she is still alive tomorrow.” Despite her mother’s dire condition, the pulmonary specialist never came back the following day.

Two days later J’s mother passed away. R’s doctor was nowhere to be found. It turned out he was on vacation. Neither the nurses nor the morturary could not locate him to sign the death certificate for burial.

After R was buried, J went back to the hospital to collect all her of her mother’s medical records. That was when J discovered that two different Primary Care Physicians had signed a “Do Not Resuscitate” order without J’s permission or even discussing it with her at all. J was shocked. She also discovered the endoscopy that was done when she thought her mother was having a swallowing evaluation. The chest x-rays showed fluid in both of R’s lungs, which had caused her shortness of breath and eventually led to pneumonia and her passing.

In J’s view, “So many mistakes were made. If they had been addressed diligently by the PCPs and specialists, who took the Hippocratic oath to do no harm, my mother would still have a few more years with her children and grandchildren. There is no dollar sign for a human life.”

J wanted to hold the doctors accountable for their mistakes and withholding of life-saving medication. But California’s cap on damages, set in 1975, meant that no lawyer could afford to take her case. An older patient, R had no future earnings and, in the eyes of the outdated law, her life meant nothing. J could not get justice for her mother and she does not want the same to happen to other families.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Anonymous R appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Anonymous S https://patientsforfairness.org/anonymouss/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=anonymouss Sun, 11 Jul 2021 07:13:00 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1103 Instead of emergency medication for a pulmonary embolism, S. was given a cardiac stress test that led to his death.

The post Anonymous S appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

S., an otherwise healthy 51-year-old merchant marine, husband and father of three sons, went to the emergency room exhibiting clear signs of a pulmonary embolism — blockage of the pulmonary artery or one of its branches to the lung. The emergency room doctor suspected as much and ordered a CT scan to confirm.

Inexplicably, the results of the CT scan were misinterpreted as negative when they in fact were positive. The radiologist claimed that he told the ER physician that the results were positive even though the ER physician clearly wrote “negative” in the records. If the scan had been noted correctly, the life-saving anticoagulation treatment would have been started immediately and maintained until he was out of danger.

Instead, anticoagulants that were started shortly after admission to the hospital were stopped hours later and not restarted because of a communication breakdown between various doctors. While waiting for an additional test to be performed to look further for pulmonary embolism, a cardiologist who knew nothing about the suspected pulmonary embolism put S. on a treadmill to stress-test his heart. If the cardiologist had communicated with the primary care physician, he never would have performed a cardiac stress test because of the elevated risk it presented for a patient with suspected pulmonary embolism. The simple and essential communication never occurred and within one minute of starting the exercise treadmill test, S. dropped to his knees and could barely breathe. 

Roughly twelve minutes later he was dead.

One of the expert witnesses in the case remarked that the events were akin to three fielders in a baseball game watching a pop-up fall between them — the fielders were doctors with a patient’s life at risk.

The horrific chain of events led to his death just short of his 26th wedding anniversary. S.’s condition was treatable, and he should have enjoyed a longer life with his wife, his sons, and his newborn grandchild.

When the case was resolved in 2013, the survivor damages for the emotional toll, and everything S.’s wife and three surviving sons had lost upon his, death were limited to $250,000. This inadequate maximum is the result of an enduring and outdated 1975 cap on compensation for medical negligence.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Anonymous S appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Anonymous T https://patientsforfairness.org/anonymoust/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=anonymoust Sun, 11 Jul 2021 07:12:00 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1101 T. underwent successful surgery but her doctor forgot to reverse the anesthesia before removing her breathing tube. She lost oxygen to the brain and never regained consciousness.

The post Anonymous T appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

T. underwent a successful lap-band surgery at an outpatient surgery center, but her recovery was another story.

Five hours after T.’s surgery, her sister received a panicked call from the surgery center. She was told that T. wasn’t breathing, was foaming at the mouth and had been transferred to another hospital. The anesthesiologist had apparently removed T.’s breathing tube before giving her the drugs to reverse her anesthesia, leaving her partially paralyzed and struggling to breathe.

The clinic’s records are unclear about exactly what happened after that, but she eventually went into cardiac arrest, never regained consciousness and died three days later.

The coroner ruled that T.’s death was a result of inadequate care while she was under anesthesia. An independent anesthesiologist who examined the coroner’s notes questioned whether, as an obese woman with sleep apnea, T. should have even been approved for outpatient surgery. But the report said T. could have survived if she had just received appropriate postoperative care in time.

T. died a needless death, but since she was not married and had no children, her life was worth no more than $250,000 under California’s outdated compensation cap in medical negligence cases. Because of the 1975 cap, her surviving siblings were unable to pursue a medical negligence suit.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Anonymous T appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Anonymous J https://patientsforfairness.org/anonymousj/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=anonymousj Sun, 11 Jul 2021 07:09:00 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1098 J.’s doctor failed to notify her of a critical vaccine she would need after spleen removal. She contracted a preventable infection and now lives with chronic pain.

The post Anonymous J appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

J.’s routine spleen removal surgery was completed without incident. After recovery, she left the hospital relieved, believing her medical woes had been taken care of. Years later, however, a preventable infection developed which would change J.’s life forever.

One day, J. noticed lacerations on her hands and feet, which began to spread all over her limbs. As it turns out, she had contracted an infection that was destroying her arms and legs. After rushing to the hospital for treatment, it was revealed that she was supposed to have received a vaccine within 5 years of her spleen removal. It is common knowledge in the medical field that spleen removal decreases patients’ ability to fight various infections. The doctors who performed the initial surgery failed to notify her of this critical aspect of post-operative care.

What followed were years of needless agony that lead to numerous operations and amputated fingers, toes, and feet.

“Every step is painful. It feels like walking on sharp rocks,” she said. “It’s really hard. I feel helpless and useless.”

California’s outdated cap on compensation for the lost quality of life caused by medical negligence means that patients like J. can receive no more than $250,000 for enduring years of pain, suffering and heartache.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Screen Shot 2021-06-14 at 3.12.08 PM

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Anonymous J appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Shelly Gerrans https://patientsforfairness.org/shellygerrans/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=shellygerrans Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:23:36 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1390 A medical device is left in Shelly's abdomen during a routine hysterectomy. She becomes paralyzed and the resulting medical costs force her family into bankruptcy.

The post Shelly Gerrans appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

 Share Shelly’s Story
Facebook Share Button

Shelly Gerrans was a homemaker, a loving wife, and a caring mother to three young children. When she needed a hysterectomy, she and her husband Larry weren’t worried. They had insurance through Larry’s employer that would cover the procedure. What they didn’t imagine, however, was the possibility that medical negligence would completely derail their lives.

Shelly went in for the surgery in the winter of 2006 and it seemed to have gone well. But by August she had chronic, severe pelvic pain. She was told that she was just healing and the pain was normal, and given painkillers. There was never a follow-up pelvic exam. Then, over the course of six weeks, Shelly began to lose feeling in her legs.

One afternoon Shelly collapsed on the kitchen floor, unable to stand. From the waist down, she had become paralyzed. X-rays revealed the source of the pain and paralysis — a uterine manipulator had been left inside of her abdomen during the hysterectomy. Shelly was rushed into emergency surgery to have the device removed, but the damage had already been done. 

The Gerrans’ found a lawyer who was willing to take their case to court. However, a law passed in California in 1975 severely limited compensation for everything Shelly had endured. Because she was a stay-at-home mother, and they had insurance, her economic damages were minimal. And, in the eyes of this outdated law, Shelly’s life as an able-bodied, full-time mother was capped at a maximum of $250,000. The Gerrans’ troubles got worse during the 2008 financial crisis. Larry lost his job, including his insurance, and they were bankrupted by medical bills. Shelly still had lots of recovery and physical therapy ahead of her that her settlement failed to pay for.

“We lost our home, we lost everything.  There was no way we could keep up with the ongoing medical costs after I lost my job,” Larry said, “All because of a doctor’s negligence.” 

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Shelly Gerrans appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Aspen Adams https://patientsforfairness.org/aspenadams/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=aspenadams Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:11:55 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1371 Baby Aspen undergoes a successful surgery to have a tumor removed, but receives a lethal dose of anesthesia, resulting in her death.

The post Aspen Adams appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

 Share Aspen’s Story
Facebook Share Button

Aspen Adams was a happy, healthy, energetic baby. But when she was 21 months old, her mother Leah discovered a lump on her belly.

She took Aspen to the doctor the next day, a Monday, and Aspen was quickly sent to the hospital for a CT-scan. By Tuesday morning they knew that Aspen had liver cancer.

Later that morning, Aspen was given anesthesia for an MRI, which made her lethargic and disoriented for the remainder of the day. This made her mother nervous since Aspen was scheduled to have a biopsy the next day. A registered nurse, Leah was worried about what too much anesthesia would do to her tiny daughter. She and the nurses were concerned that Aspen wasn’t ready to go into surgery, but the doctor insisted that they move forward with the biopsy.

When Aspen came out of the operating room, she seemed okay. The procedure seemed to have gone smoothly. But the next day her body was swollen, her urine turned brown, and she was still lethargic.

Medical staff reassured Leah that her daughter was fine and told her the medication was probably the cause of the brown urine.

However, later that day, Aspen’s vital signs plummeted and she passed away. She was killed by a drug overdose, having been given three successive doses of anesthesia within a window of less than 48 hours – before the MRI, during the biopsy, and after the biopsy.

Aspen would have survived the liver cancer after its removal, but her life was cut short by the brazen decision to go ahead with a non-emergency procedure despite overwhelming risk. Experts later confirmed with Leah that her daughter had been given far above the recommended dose of anesthesia for a toddler.  

Aspen’s parents were unable to hold anyone accountable for her death, because of a California’s 46-year-old cap on damages in medical malpractice cases. Lawyers cannot afford to take cases like Aspen’s because in the eyes of the 1975 law, children’s lives are worth very little. It would cost as much to bring this case as a lawyer could possibly recover.

Leah never wants another family to lose a child like hers did. 

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

No items were found matching your selection.

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Aspen Adams appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Malyia Jeffers https://patientsforfairness.org/malyiajeffers/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=malyiajeffers Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:09:48 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1367 Little Malyia waited in the ER lobby for hours with a rapidly spreading infection, resulting in the amputation of her legs and parts of her hands.

The post Malyia Jeffers appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

 Share Malyia’s Story
Facebook Share Button

Two-year-old Malyia Jeffers had an ever-rising fever and unexpected bruising around her cheeks. Her parents rushed her to a Sacramento emergency room, where they waited for hours even though her condition continued to worsen. Her parents repeatedly begged to get her medical attention but were ignored until her father forced his way into the medical department and demanded help.

Five hours after she arrived, Malyia was finally seen by a physician, who saw the seriousness of her situation and had her flown to Stanford hospital. But by then, the damage was done. Streptococcus bacteria had invaded her blood, muscles, and organs; her liver was failing.

In order to save Malyia’s life, doctors had to amputate lower parts of both of her legs, her left hand and part of her right hand.  
She will have to adjust to different prosthetics as she grows and deal with ongoing “phantom limb” pain. She likely will face additional surgery.

A financial settlement will cover some of the costs of her ongoing care, but because the outdated 1975 cap on compensation is one-size-fits-all, the Malyia’s lifetime without limbs and her parents struggles to care for her are valued at no more than $250,000.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

No items were found matching your selection.

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Malyia Jeffers appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Jessie Geyer https://patientsforfairness.org/jessiegeyer/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=jessiegeyer Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:08:29 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1364 The failure to administer a life-saving antibiotic meant the death of 7-year-old Jessie.

The post Jessie Geyer appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

 

 Share Jessie’s Story
Facebook Share Button

A few days before Halloween, 7-year-old Jessie Geyer began to feel lousy. She had a high fever and severe leg pain. It was bad enough feeling sick, but the second grader worried that she might have to miss out on the Halloween parade at her school, as well as trick-or-treating.

Her illness worsened and she realized she would have to miss the fun. But the ever-cheerful little girl told her Mom to make sure to save her costume for next year. “She was in such good spirits,” her Mom, Michelle Geyer, says.

Before the week was out, Jessie had died. She was a victim of sepsis, which both her pediatrician and the emergency room doctor who treated her failed to diagnose. An antibiotic could have saved her.

Her parents, Mark and Michelle Geyer, are still trying to get on with their lives, after experiencing the worst thing that can happen to a parent. Jessie’s younger brothers also continue to struggle.

The effort to find accountability in Jessie’s death has compounded the pain. Attorneys from major law firms declined to take her case because of California’s 45-year-old Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA). The law, an anachronism that protects doctors and insurance companies while wounding patients and their survivors, limits “pain and suffering” damages to $250,000 – a figure that was set in 1975 and would be $1.2 million today if adjusted for inflation.

“Getting a lawyer was horrible,” says Michelle. She contacted several top San Francisco area law firms and they told her “you have an excellent case, but this would be a bad business decision” because of the 1975 cap.

Like most Californians, the Geyers had never heard of the $250,000 cap on compensation. It’s one of California’s “best kept secrets,” says Michelle.

But now they are dead set on amending or eliminating it.

“We’re looking for accountability,” says Mark.

Jessie’s illness began two days before Halloween, on October 29. She awoke with a high fever and intense leg pain. They took her to her pediatrician at Diablo Valley Pediatrics, who said it looked like a bacterial infection and told the Geyers to take Jessie to John Muir Medical Center.

The doctor there took an x-ray, which he said showed nothing unusual, and decided she probably had a flu-related virus. He gave her a non-prescription pain reliever and sent them home.

A series of failed communications ensued between the two physicians, according to Mark Geyer. “It’s like a popup between short and center; it falls in.”

Because of that, Jessie never had a culture taken. And no antibiotics were prescribed.

“Both doctors blew it,” says Mark.

Meanwhile, Jessie sat at home, getting worse, while her parents believed she was on the road to recovery. “That’s what haunts me,” says Michelle. “She was home two days, and she was dying.”

On Halloween night the leg swelled and the fever broke. Jessie got clammy. She weakened quickly, and went into shock. Mark rushed her to the Sutter Delta Medical Center emergency room, then went back to get Michelle, at the doctor’s suggestion.

“We told her to fight, and that we loved her,” says Mark. “She said, ‘I love you.’ She closed her eyes and the monitor went flat.”

Jessie’s stunned parents — Michelle went into hysterics while Mark became all but catatonic — didn’t know what had taken their daughter’s life. They were not to find out for months, when a forensic pathologist working for the Centers for Disease Control discovered that she had died from a group A streptococcal infection that had spread throughout her body.

The death could have been prevented with proper medical attention.

When they learned that, the Geyers embarked on their search for an attorney. They finally found one, after being rebuffed by multiple lawyers who would not touch it. The cap on damages does not work for children, stay-at-home Moms, the retired, and others who don’t have an income.

The suit has been filed in Contra Costa County and awaits depositions. The Geyers got where they are by being persistent. The county coroner’s office, for example, wanted to list Jessie’s death as having an “undetermined cause.” The Geyers wouldn’t settle for that. They believe “there are a lot of other people like us…who just gave up.

The Geyers want two things, in addition to prevailing in the malpractice suit. They want the 1975 cap amended to reflect the 46 years of inflation; and they want it to cover people who don’t have incomes, like children and the elderly.

“In the world of 2004,” the Geyers write on their website, dedicated to ‘Jessie’s Law,’ “$250,000 is often not sufficient to bring the case to trial, considering the expense of the attorney, the many depositions, the research and the high cost of expert testimony.

“This is particularly unfair to children…because they are not eligible for ‘actual damages’ since they are not considered wage earners. The result is that very few malpractice cases where children are the victims and parents consumed with the greatest loss of all never make it to court.”

“The system is broken,” say Michelle Geyer. “We have a really bad combination. The health care system combined with this MICRA law is horrific.”

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

No items were found matching your selection.

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Jessie Geyer appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Anthony Fossett https://patientsforfairness.org/anthonyfossett/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=anthonyfossett Mon, 14 Jun 2021 22:29:48 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1354 Young musician, Anthony went into open heart surgery. After incorrectly placing a valve, doctors refuse to perform corrective surgery, resulting in the young man's death.

The post Anthony Fossett appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

 Share Anthony’s Story
Facebook Share Button

Anthony Fossett was a young aspiring musician and a beloved member of his community. An alumnus of Youth Radio’s Core and Bridge program, Anthony wanted to be a music producer and hoped to eventually start his own studio. Anthony had begun performing at the Oakland Museum and was helping to produce local rap artists. He was making great strides to achieve his dreams until medical negligence derailed it all.

Upon discovering that Anthony was having heart problems, doctors determined that a mitral valve surgery was necessary to save his life. While in surgery, the doctors placed the valve incorrectly, causing it to leak and triggering further complications. Anthony’s mother, Regina, begged them to attempt corrective surgery but the hospital refused and claimed that medications would correct their mistake. A few days later, the replacement valve broke apart, causing Anthony’s heart failure and death.

Anthony’s mother sought justice for her son and hoped to hold the negligent doctors that killed him accountable. However, because of the nearly 50-year-old cap that limits compensation for injured patients to $250,000, she could not find a lawyer to take her case.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

No items were found matching your selection.

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Anthony Fossett appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>