senate district 24 – Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients https://patientsforfairness.org 46 years is too long. Tue, 20 Dec 2022 17:19:46 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://patientsforfairness.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/cropped-favicon-1-90x90.png senate district 24 – Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients https://patientsforfairness.org 32 32 Anonymous R https://patientsforfairness.org/anonymousr/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=anonymousr Sun, 11 Jul 2021 07:14:00 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1106 R.’s glaring symptoms of pneumonia were brushed off until it was too late.

The post Anonymous R appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

J’s mother R was a lawyer and an active member of the Filipino American Veterans Association in Los Angeles. J says that her mother was healthy and alert when one day she began complaining of shortness of breath. 

J, a medical doctor herself, called for an ambulance and accompanied her mother to the Emergency Room of the nearby hospital where her Primary Care Physician worked. R was diagnosed with pneumonia and given antibiotics. When she began to improve, instead of being transferred to the Transitional Care Unit, she was brought to the neighboring Rehabilitation Center where she did physical therapy.

However, R again felt shortness of breath a few days later. Her doctor sent her back to the Emergency Room, where she received a chest x-ray. J never saw the results.

A swallowing evaluation was ordered to rule out aspiration pneumonia. But unbeknownst to J, her mother instead underwent an endoscopy. The procedure was not ordered by R’s doctor and the hospital did not ask R’s permission. J was never told about the test and, again, never saw the results.

At the hospital, R lost a lot of weight. Both the nurse on duty and J notified R’s doctor, but the doctor ignored this cause for concern. R’s doctor wrote an order for her transfer to the Transitional Care Unit. Again, she was denied admittance and sent to the Rehabilitation Center.

Back at the center, R’s shortness of breath returned. She was feverish and sweating a lot. However, the doctor on call only ordered Tylenol for the next several days. R received no antibiotics or other medication despite her continued symptoms of pneumonia.

When R’s doctor finally came to visit her, J informed him that her mother needed more than just Tylenol. She needed antibiotics. A doctor herself, J suspected her mother still had pneumonia. However the doctor said nothing and walked away. J still received no antibiotics.

Two days later, J told the nurse to call an ambulance and take R back to ER. There, she was finally diagnosed with pneumonia and given the medication she needed. The pulmonary specialist came to see her and told J that he would evacuate the fluid form R’s lungs the next day “if she is still alive tomorrow.” Despite her mother’s dire condition, the pulmonary specialist never came back the following day.

Two days later J’s mother passed away. R’s doctor was nowhere to be found. It turned out he was on vacation. Neither the nurses nor the morturary could not locate him to sign the death certificate for burial.

After R was buried, J went back to the hospital to collect all her of her mother’s medical records. That was when J discovered that two different Primary Care Physicians had signed a “Do Not Resuscitate” order without J’s permission or even discussing it with her at all. J was shocked. She also discovered the endoscopy that was done when she thought her mother was having a swallowing evaluation. The chest x-rays showed fluid in both of R’s lungs, which had caused her shortness of breath and eventually led to pneumonia and her passing.

In J’s view, “So many mistakes were made. If they had been addressed diligently by the PCPs and specialists, who took the Hippocratic oath to do no harm, my mother would still have a few more years with her children and grandchildren. There is no dollar sign for a human life.”

J wanted to hold the doctors accountable for their mistakes and withholding of life-saving medication. But California’s cap on damages, set in 1975, meant that no lawyer could afford to take her case. An older patient, R had no future earnings and, in the eyes of the outdated law, her life meant nothing. J could not get justice for her mother and she does not want the same to happen to other families.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Anonymous R appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Charles Senior https://patientsforfairness.org/charlessenior/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=charlessenior Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:05:00 +0000 https://patientsforfairness.org/?p=17649 Charles’ allergic reaction to medication was dismissed and he was pumped with medication until he lost consciousness.

The post Charles Senior appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

 

 Share Charles Story
Facebook Share Button

Charles Senior moved to California with a music career in mind.  He started working at Sony as a supervisor in private security with the intention of being discovered.  He was a singer but felt his passion was in writing.  Charles wrote a couple of hit songs, but without representation things did not go as he had hoped.  He took his experience in physical security and opened his own security business.  He and his wife also owned and ran Katherine’s, a Thai restaurant, in Downtown Los Angeles for decades.  Charles was forced to close his business when he became disabled due to medical negligence. 

 

Charles went to the ER after having an allergic reaction to medication.  While his medication allergies were well documented in his medical record, and he told each new doctor of these allergies, they dismissed his concerns and kept pumping him full of medicine.  As he was shuffled between various providers, each new prescription worsened Charles’s condition until he developed shortness of breath, bumps on the roof of his mouth, chest, and stomach, and his tongue turned black.  Each provider failed to check his medical records to verify his allergies, and instead came to various incorrect diagnoses, including pneumonia, asthma, and bronchitis. Each new doctor’s treatment of Charles relied on these false diagnoses, so they continued to give Charles medication that placed him in a vicious cycle of dangerous allergic reactions.     

 

With each day, Charles’ condition worsened.  He went back to the emergency room where he told the doctor that the medication he was being prescribed was making him far sicker.  That provider ordered breathing treatments with medication similar to prednisone.  Again, the medication worsened his condition.  Charles played football and used to box, but he felt like these complications were taking him down.  Five hours after being sent home, Charles lost consciousness. Back in the hospital, he was prescribed more medication but this time he didn’t take it.  Charles told his wife, “I think they are going to kill me.”  His labs showed that he had liver and kidney damage and extreme nerve damage.  A once very healthy man became incredibly sick in a matter of a few hospital visits. 

 

Charles, in total, saw seven different doctors.  He trusted them, but each prescribed medication made his condition worse. While he was struggling with the resulting kidney disease, severe nerve damage, and loss of his voice, a complication – the inability to void his bladder, forced Charles back to the emergency room. Inconceivably, given the repeated medication errors and misdiagnoses he had already endured, Charles suffered his most horrific experience of harm and neglect in the course of this hospital visit.   

 

The hospital sent Charles a urologist to deal with his inability to urinate. He arrived with not one, but five, catheters, and could not insert the catheters correctly. Charles was left bleeding profusely from his groin after the urologist punctured his penis with the catheters five times.  Charles’ hospital gown was bloodied, and the floor was covered in blood.  When a urinal he was brought filled with blood, the nurse would simply dump it down the sink and give him another.  The bleeding would not stop, and no one was helping him. Charles ultimately walked with the blood-filled urinal over to a security camera outside of the emergency room in a desperate attempt to get someone’s attention.  He wanted to leave an image of his bloodied self on the hospital security camera in case something should happen to him.  A different urologist finally came to treat him and discovered the severe damage to the inside of his groin, but it was too late. The damage was irreparable. 

 

Charles could no longer work or run his business. After his wife had a stroke that left her unable to work as well, they were forced to close their businesses.  Charles needed speech therapy and continued medical care for nerve damage.  He was left with lung damage and serious breathing issues. He can no longer sit in a chair for any amount of time without experiencing intolerable pain.  Now permanently disabled and in need of help, Charles sought legal counsel, but his case was turned down by multiple lawyers.  Due to the nearly 50 year-old cap on medical negligence, no lawyer would take his case and he had to represent himself. He is not a trained lawyer and lost his case.  The effects of the $250,000 cap on compensation for a patient’s pain and suffering, no matter how extreme the trauma, are immeasurable in Charles’s case. 

Charles never imagined that he could experience a sentinel event in a hospital.  He now finds himself not only fighting for his own health but for the health and wellbeing of all Californians.  Charles is dedicated to the fight to adjust the cap in order to give other Californians the accountability that he was denied. He is supporting the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot in California.  

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Charles Senior appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>