Los Angeles, CA – Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients https://patientsforfairness.org 46 years is too long. Tue, 20 Dec 2022 17:19:48 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://patientsforfairness.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/cropped-favicon-1-90x90.png Los Angeles, CA – Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients https://patientsforfairness.org 32 32 Anonymous R https://patientsforfairness.org/anonymousr/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=anonymousr Sun, 11 Jul 2021 07:14:00 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1106 R.’s glaring symptoms of pneumonia were brushed off until it was too late.

The post Anonymous R appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

J’s mother R was a lawyer and an active member of the Filipino American Veterans Association in Los Angeles. J says that her mother was healthy and alert when one day she began complaining of shortness of breath. 

J, a medical doctor herself, called for an ambulance and accompanied her mother to the Emergency Room of the nearby hospital where her Primary Care Physician worked. R was diagnosed with pneumonia and given antibiotics. When she began to improve, instead of being transferred to the Transitional Care Unit, she was brought to the neighboring Rehabilitation Center where she did physical therapy.

However, R again felt shortness of breath a few days later. Her doctor sent her back to the Emergency Room, where she received a chest x-ray. J never saw the results.

A swallowing evaluation was ordered to rule out aspiration pneumonia. But unbeknownst to J, her mother instead underwent an endoscopy. The procedure was not ordered by R’s doctor and the hospital did not ask R’s permission. J was never told about the test and, again, never saw the results.

At the hospital, R lost a lot of weight. Both the nurse on duty and J notified R’s doctor, but the doctor ignored this cause for concern. R’s doctor wrote an order for her transfer to the Transitional Care Unit. Again, she was denied admittance and sent to the Rehabilitation Center.

Back at the center, R’s shortness of breath returned. She was feverish and sweating a lot. However, the doctor on call only ordered Tylenol for the next several days. R received no antibiotics or other medication despite her continued symptoms of pneumonia.

When R’s doctor finally came to visit her, J informed him that her mother needed more than just Tylenol. She needed antibiotics. A doctor herself, J suspected her mother still had pneumonia. However the doctor said nothing and walked away. J still received no antibiotics.

Two days later, J told the nurse to call an ambulance and take R back to ER. There, she was finally diagnosed with pneumonia and given the medication she needed. The pulmonary specialist came to see her and told J that he would evacuate the fluid form R’s lungs the next day “if she is still alive tomorrow.” Despite her mother’s dire condition, the pulmonary specialist never came back the following day.

Two days later J’s mother passed away. R’s doctor was nowhere to be found. It turned out he was on vacation. Neither the nurses nor the morturary could not locate him to sign the death certificate for burial.

After R was buried, J went back to the hospital to collect all her of her mother’s medical records. That was when J discovered that two different Primary Care Physicians had signed a “Do Not Resuscitate” order without J’s permission or even discussing it with her at all. J was shocked. She also discovered the endoscopy that was done when she thought her mother was having a swallowing evaluation. The chest x-rays showed fluid in both of R’s lungs, which had caused her shortness of breath and eventually led to pneumonia and her passing.

In J’s view, “So many mistakes were made. If they had been addressed diligently by the PCPs and specialists, who took the Hippocratic oath to do no harm, my mother would still have a few more years with her children and grandchildren. There is no dollar sign for a human life.”

J wanted to hold the doctors accountable for their mistakes and withholding of life-saving medication. But California’s cap on damages, set in 1975, meant that no lawyer could afford to take her case. An older patient, R had no future earnings and, in the eyes of the outdated law, her life meant nothing. J could not get justice for her mother and she does not want the same to happen to other families.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Anonymous R appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Angel Villalobos https://patientsforfairness.org/angelvillalobos/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=angelvillalobos Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:46:09 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1154 Little Angel's botched heart surgery leads to permanent brain damage

The post Angel Villalobos appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

 Share Angel’s Story
Facebook Share Button

Angel Villalobos was born with just one heart ventricle instead of two. A series of operations early in life should have fixed the problem and left him with a normal life. But during the third operation, when Angel was five, the surgeon cut through Angel’s breastbone using the location of an earlier incision and cut Angel’s aorta with an oscillating saw. Twelve minutes of massive blood loss left Angel with severe brain damage.

Because of the earlier operations, the surgeon should have known of the possibility that Angel’s aorta was attached to the inside of his breastbone. Additionally, an angiogram before the operation showed there was practically no space between the aorta and the breastbone. Under those conditions, a different procedure, one that did not use an oscillating saw, would have been called for to cut into Angel’s chest. Certainly, a backup plan should have been ready to implement in case the aorta was cut.

Angel, now 17, is left with the mental capacity of an infant. He cannot speak, eat, or drink by himself. He needs medicines regularly and his food specially prepared. Although he has learned to walk, he does not know how to cross a street, needs a diaper change every two hours, and support 24 hours a day. To care for Angel round the clock, his mother, Mixzi, quit her job and she never worked since. Her husband works full time and relieves her when she is sick.

Angel’s family received a settlement totaling $3 million to cover his expenses, but none for the pain and suffering of Angel or his parents. “We got nothing for them ruining our lives,” said Mixzi. “To tell you the truth, I don’t think this is enough money to care for my son. I don’t think it was what he deserved.” The settlement was calculated to last for Angel’s care only until the age of 41, she said.

The state is also paying for Angel’s care. Mixzi qualified for 80 hours a month of care for Angel at a state-funded center for the disabled. She also qualifies for help with in-home care for 100 hours a month. “They pay to take care of our son at home, it is not as expensive as a nursing home,” Mixzi said. The catch is that Mixzi now has to pay more out of pocket since Angel turned 18.  

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Angel Villalobos appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Charles Senior https://patientsforfairness.org/charlessenior/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=charlessenior Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:05:00 +0000 https://patientsforfairness.org/?p=17649 Charles’ allergic reaction to medication was dismissed and he was pumped with medication until he lost consciousness.

The post Charles Senior appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

 

 Share Charles Story
Facebook Share Button

Charles Senior moved to California with a music career in mind.  He started working at Sony as a supervisor in private security with the intention of being discovered.  He was a singer but felt his passion was in writing.  Charles wrote a couple of hit songs, but without representation things did not go as he had hoped.  He took his experience in physical security and opened his own security business.  He and his wife also owned and ran Katherine’s, a Thai restaurant, in Downtown Los Angeles for decades.  Charles was forced to close his business when he became disabled due to medical negligence. 

 

Charles went to the ER after having an allergic reaction to medication.  While his medication allergies were well documented in his medical record, and he told each new doctor of these allergies, they dismissed his concerns and kept pumping him full of medicine.  As he was shuffled between various providers, each new prescription worsened Charles’s condition until he developed shortness of breath, bumps on the roof of his mouth, chest, and stomach, and his tongue turned black.  Each provider failed to check his medical records to verify his allergies, and instead came to various incorrect diagnoses, including pneumonia, asthma, and bronchitis. Each new doctor’s treatment of Charles relied on these false diagnoses, so they continued to give Charles medication that placed him in a vicious cycle of dangerous allergic reactions.     

 

With each day, Charles’ condition worsened.  He went back to the emergency room where he told the doctor that the medication he was being prescribed was making him far sicker.  That provider ordered breathing treatments with medication similar to prednisone.  Again, the medication worsened his condition.  Charles played football and used to box, but he felt like these complications were taking him down.  Five hours after being sent home, Charles lost consciousness. Back in the hospital, he was prescribed more medication but this time he didn’t take it.  Charles told his wife, “I think they are going to kill me.”  His labs showed that he had liver and kidney damage and extreme nerve damage.  A once very healthy man became incredibly sick in a matter of a few hospital visits. 

 

Charles, in total, saw seven different doctors.  He trusted them, but each prescribed medication made his condition worse. While he was struggling with the resulting kidney disease, severe nerve damage, and loss of his voice, a complication – the inability to void his bladder, forced Charles back to the emergency room. Inconceivably, given the repeated medication errors and misdiagnoses he had already endured, Charles suffered his most horrific experience of harm and neglect in the course of this hospital visit.   

 

The hospital sent Charles a urologist to deal with his inability to urinate. He arrived with not one, but five, catheters, and could not insert the catheters correctly. Charles was left bleeding profusely from his groin after the urologist punctured his penis with the catheters five times.  Charles’ hospital gown was bloodied, and the floor was covered in blood.  When a urinal he was brought filled with blood, the nurse would simply dump it down the sink and give him another.  The bleeding would not stop, and no one was helping him. Charles ultimately walked with the blood-filled urinal over to a security camera outside of the emergency room in a desperate attempt to get someone’s attention.  He wanted to leave an image of his bloodied self on the hospital security camera in case something should happen to him.  A different urologist finally came to treat him and discovered the severe damage to the inside of his groin, but it was too late. The damage was irreparable. 

 

Charles could no longer work or run his business. After his wife had a stroke that left her unable to work as well, they were forced to close their businesses.  Charles needed speech therapy and continued medical care for nerve damage.  He was left with lung damage and serious breathing issues. He can no longer sit in a chair for any amount of time without experiencing intolerable pain.  Now permanently disabled and in need of help, Charles sought legal counsel, but his case was turned down by multiple lawyers.  Due to the nearly 50 year-old cap on medical negligence, no lawyer would take his case and he had to represent himself. He is not a trained lawyer and lost his case.  The effects of the $250,000 cap on compensation for a patient’s pain and suffering, no matter how extreme the trauma, are immeasurable in Charles’s case. 

Charles never imagined that he could experience a sentinel event in a hospital.  He now finds himself not only fighting for his own health but for the health and wellbeing of all Californians.  Charles is dedicated to the fight to adjust the cap in order to give other Californians the accountability that he was denied. He is supporting the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot in California.  

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Charles Senior appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Kira Johnson https://patientsforfairness.org/kirajohnson/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=kirajohnson Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:07:00 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1191 Kira lost her life when her family's pleas for help after a routine C-section were ignored. A law that hasn’t changed since 1975 means families who lose a mother in childbirth cannot get justice. Her family is fighting to change that.

The post Kira Johnson appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

 Share Kira’s Story

Facebook Share Button

 

39-year-old Kira Johnson was a remarkable person. She could speak five languages, had raced cars, possessed a pilot’s license and even skydived as a hobby. She shared this active lifestyle with Charles, her husband of 10 years, and Charles Jr, their 19 month old son.  

The family was thrilled when Kira learned she was pregnant with their second child. When the Johnsons were told that Kira would have to deliver by C-section, they tried not to worry. Kira was in great shape and didn’t have any major health problems.

In April of 2016, Kira went to the hospital in Los Angeles where she had scheduled her routine C-section. After the procedure Kira complained of severe pain in her abdomen. Over the next several hours she started to shake, grew pale and became increasingly sensitive to touch. When they saw blood in her catheter her family knew how serious it was. Charles and the rest of the family begged the doctor and medical staff to address Kira’s symptoms and run tests. A CT was ordered but never happened.

For more than 10 hours Kira writhed in pain with no response from her medical team. When Kira’s doctor finally took her into emergency surgery to find out what was wrong, 3 liters of blood were found in her abdomen. The doctors had lacerated her bladder during the C-section and Kira had been bleeding internally for hours. Kira died on the operating table.

To her husband, Kira’s death was shocking and outrageous. She was healthy and fit and they had told the doctors for hours something was wrong only to be ignored. The hospital was dismissive with the family when they sought answers, or even an acknowledgement of what had gone wrong. What happened to Kira – uncontrolled bleeding that was identified too late – is a common, preventable cause of maternal mortality, and is one of the reasons three times as many African-American women than Caucasian women die in childbirth in California.

Stonewalled by the hospital when he sought answers, Charles sought to hold the doctor accountable. But Kira was a stay-at-home mom. Lawyers usually turn away these cases because, under California’s cap on malpractice damages, the most a family can recover when a non-wage-earning mother dies in childbirth is $250,000. That barely covers the costs of a case.

However, Charles’s mother is court television’s Judge Glenda Hackett. Her connections brought media attention to Kira’s story, and helped Charles find an attorney to take Kira’s case. They hope the case will pressure the hospital to change practices and help prevent the deaths of other mothers.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Kira Johnson appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>