Senate District 13 – Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients https://patientsforfairness.org 46 years is too long. Tue, 20 Dec 2022 17:19:47 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://patientsforfairness.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/cropped-favicon-1-90x90.png Senate District 13 – Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients https://patientsforfairness.org 32 32 Angelica Chisolm https://patientsforfairness.org/angelicachisolm/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=angelicachisolm Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:14:00 +0000 http://patientsforfairness.org/?p=14961 Angelica's IV was inserted incorrectly, causing a fatal infection. Now her husband is fighting for injured patients across California.

The post Angelica Chisolm appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

 

 Share Angelica’s Story
Facebook Share Button

Angelica lived in service of others. Before her health began to deteriorate, she was a job coach for people with disabilities. Before that, she was a journalist for a local paper, covering and promoting local businesses. She grew up in Manila, Philippines, and was a journalist there before moving to the United States. She was spiritual and practiced Buddhism. 

After years of kidney and vascular issues, Angelica had developed respiratory difficulties that landed her in the hospital several times a year. Her husband David retired with the intent of helping to take care of her. They signed her up for physical therapy classes. Her health began to improve, and she was making fewer trips to the hospital. They were optimistic.

Despite her improvement, a flare of trouble breathing brought her back to the emergency room. She was given a standard IV and received the treatment she usually did. But when her arm ballooned alarmingly, it was determined that she had a major infection.

Angelica was taken into emergency surgery to have the infection removed. The surgery seemed to have worked and symptoms of infection ceased. However, she was left with an open wound and a disfigured arm. The infection had reached a nerve, causing permanent damage that made her unable to use her hand.

A nurse admitted to Angelica and David that the IV had been placed incorrectly, into subcutaneous tissue instead of a vein, causing the infection. Soon after, Angelica began showing symptoms again and was brought in for a second surgery. The prolonged infection and recovery kept her in the hospital for months.

Meanwhile, David noticed that Angelica’s wedding ring was missing. It was removed for surgery and had since disappeared. David told the hospital, and a search was conducted, but the ring was never found. The hospital did not offer to help recover the cost.

When Angelica was finally almost ready to be discharged and recover at home, her doctor determined she should have her gall bladder removed. 

Gall bladder removal is a common procedure, but David had reservations about Angelica undergoing another surgery so soon. A surgical tech himself, he had observed and assisted in gall bladder surgeries countless times before. He knew they were only urgent in emergency situations, and he recalls that Angelica was not showing emergency symptoms. She was in a weakened state due to the recent infection and other complications, but the gall bladder removal was not critical. Her doctor should have done everything possible to promote her recovery before attempting another procedure.

Angelica went into the third surgery and did not survive. David believes her doctors should have recognized that her body would not be able to handle it so soon. 

If it were not for the months-long, preventable infection, she would have gotten through the gall bladder removal and would be alive today. And if her doctor had not rushed the final surgery, she would have had a chance to heal.

In search of justice for his wife of sixteen years, David spoke with multiple lawyers. They told him he had a potential case, but none would take it. That’s when he learned about California’s outdated $250,000 cap on damages in medical malpractice cases. The cap, set in 1975 and never adjusted for inflation, makes cases like his unaffordable.

Despite his loss of companionship, and continual medical bills for the treatment that failed Angelica, David cannot get accountability or compensation for what happened. The lost wedding ring adds insult to injury. 

David is determined to help change the 46-year-old law in Angelica’s memory. He doesn’t want to see other families lose their loved ones and have no recourse, like he did.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Angelica Chisolm appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Nora Bostrom https://patientsforfairness.org/norabostrom/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=norabostrom Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:15:00 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1325 Little Nora dies of infection after a series of medical errors: a 9 hour wait with no evaluation, inadequate equipment sterilization and a failure to maintain IV fluids.

The post Nora Bostrom appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

 

 Share Nora’s Story
Facebook Share Button

Nora Bostrom had pulmonary hypertension that required her to use oxygen and take intravenous medications. Despite these challenges, she had a high quality of life. She was a bright, funny, and happy three-year-old, full of promise and optimism. But after a visit to the hospital, she became a victim of several preventable medical errors that lead to her death.

Nora awoke one day with a high heart rate, was unable to eat or drink, and complained of heart pain. She was taken to the emergency room of a prominent Bay Area hospital where she had been treated many times before. Her parents informed Nora’s treating cardiologist of her symptoms and that they were waiting in the ER. For three hours, no one evaluated Nora. When staff finally came to see her, they did not do an examination and did not order any treatment. The family waited nearly six hours more before Nora was given IV fluids. By that time, it was too late. Nora had already gone into acute heart failure as a result of dehydration. Nora’s heart was prematurely damaged as she waited for medical care that came too late. At that point, she required additional medications and many additional hospital stays.

Within 48 hours of being admitted to the hospital for one of the subsequent stays, Nora contracted a central line infection. She went into septic shock and nearly died. A few days later, while she was recovering from septic shock, Nora contracted a hospital-borne respiratory virus. While fighting the virus, a nurse administered a double dose of a potent medication. The nurse relied upon an outdated doctor’s order and within thirty minutes of receiving the double dose, Nora suffered heart failure and respiratory distress that required intervention.

Because Nora was too sick to eat as a result of the sepsis and respiratory virus, she received all her nutrition intravenously. Her parents later discovered that Nora had not been receiving any nutrition at the time she was given the double dose. The doctors mistakenly discontinued her intravenous nutrition and no medical staff noticed for several days. By the time they discovered the error, it was too late. A few days later, Nora was dead.

Each of these errors related to standards of basic care and were easily preventable. If hospital staff had done their jobs properly, Nora would still be alive. Thanks to California’s arbitrary cap on noneconomic damages for patients harmed by medical negligence, the hospital had little incentive to reform its practices in the wake of Nora’s death.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Nora Bostrom appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Mike Bradley https://patientsforfairness.org/mikebradley/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=mikebradley Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:17:00 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1329 While recovering from surgery, the non-regulation placement of a feeding tube leads to Mike's death.

The post Mike Bradley appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

 

 Share Mike’s Story
Facebook Share Button

Mike and Carol Bradley were happily married for 46 years. At age 72, Mike was still working full time as a car salesman. He was excellent at his job and popular in the community. An avid reader, he accumulated piles of books at home. He and Carol enjoyed going out dancing together and attending music concerts. He was a good man.

Mike was generally in good health. However, his cardiologist informed him that one of his cardiac valves would need repair down the road. Rather than put it off, Mike decided to go in for elective, noninvasive, mitral valve repair. He was told it would be best to do the procedure earlier rather than later, as a preventative measure while he was relatively healthy. As a registered nurse, Carol wholeheartedly supported his decision and knew this to be a relatively routine procedure.

After the procedure, they were told it went well. But when Mike got to the ICU for recovery, he began to have seizures due to brain swelling caused by an air embolism. He went into a coma for nine days. She was told by hospital staff that this simply “happens sometimes,” even though there was no mention of the risk of an air embolism before surgery.

By the time he awoke from the coma, Mike had lost his ability to swallow. Standard practice in such cases is to remove excess fluids by suction, because they can accumulate in the respiratory system and cause pneumonia. Mike’s nurses repeatedly neglected to provide this care, even when it was clear from gurgling sounds he was making that he needed it. Carol had to repeatedly ask nurses to suction Mike, and they even deferred the task to her. Mike soon developed pneumonia.

During treatment for the infection, he was given a feeding tube. The tube was clipped to his hospital gown, against standard safety protocols, and he accidentally moved it during the night. The staff then failed to evaluate and monitor his condition according to hospital protocol resulting in massive hemorrhaging, sepsis, and complete kidney failure. Carol had to make the devastating decision to remove her husband from life support.

During his time in the hospital, Carol was constantly at his bedside, keeping an eye on his care. She had been told multiple times by staff that the hospital was shorthanded and she noticed that those on staff were recent graduates. She thought Mike’s care was dangerously sub-standard. A nurse herself, she advocated for Mike night and day, catching significant errors. She felt that no matter what she did, she couldn’t protect Mike from the problems that continued to occur.

After Mike’s death, Carol wanted to hold the hospital accountable and searched for representation. She interviewed with a total of nine lawyers, and they all told her they could not afford to take her case, due to California’s 1975 cap on survivor damages in cases of medical negligence. That law capped the value of a senior’s life at $250,000, and has never been changed. Bringing a case would cost more than the attorneys, or Carol’s family, could recover. She ultimately represented herself, navigating the legal process through her grief and mostly on her own, and reached a settlement with the hospital. Carol says there was never any conversation about what would be done to prevent this from happening again. Her efforts to ask questions about this were always blocked. By the time the case was closed, Carol felt angry and hurt and nothing was done to improve the hospital’s training or systems to prevent another life from being lost.

Carol recalls that when she and Mike rented a one-bedroom apartment in 1975, it was worth $150 per month. She recently researched the apartment’s value, and found that today it has increased to $3,150 per month. As she puts it, “What was a lot of money in 1975 is not a lot of money today.”

Carol supports updating the 1975 cap as a way to seek justice for her husband. She says that “a life is a life” – survivors and their families should be able to hold wrongdoers accountable, no matter what age. She hopes that reforming the 46-year-old cap will incentivize hospitals to provide better care. 

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Mike Bradley appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>