Senate District 36 – Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients https://patientsforfairness.org 46 years is too long. Tue, 20 Dec 2022 17:19:47 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://patientsforfairness.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/cropped-favicon-1-90x90.png Senate District 36 – Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients https://patientsforfairness.org 32 32 Patricia McMillan https://patientsforfairness.org/patricia-mcmillan/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=patricia-mcmillan Fri, 01 Apr 2022 19:57:47 +0000 https://patientsforfairness.org/?p=17895 Insufficient preventative and post-operative care lead to a severe staph infection in Patricia’s eye, causing permanent blindness.

The post Patricia McMillan appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

Share Patricia’s Story
Facebook Share Button

Patricia McMillan was enjoying her work as a paralegal and looking forward to the arrival of her first grandchild when she was diagnosed with an epiretinal membrane, a common eye condition that can impair vision if left untreated. Her vision was 20/20 with corrective lenses, but she elected to have a routine corrective procedure to prevent potential future impairment. She was encouraged and reassured by her retina surgeon. On the day of the surgery at a renowned eye institute in the San Diego area, Patricia was rushed through pre-op. The surgeon never came by to speak with her. She awoke mid-surgery, terrified, as the anesthesia had not been administered properly. Someone noticed she was awake and held her hand.

After the procedure, she was told the surgery went well. Still affected by the anesthesia, she was barely coherent, but they encouraged her to get dressed and leave.

By evening the next day, Patricia suddenly developed an excruciating headache and eye pain, and began vomiting. Her eye was constantly watering. These symptoms were mentioned in her discharge instructions as serious enough to call the emergency number provided by the optometrist. She called, but the clinic told her that she should wait until her appointment in the morning the next day. She tried to hold out, but the pain was so severe that she decided to go to the emergency room.

In the ER, her eye shield was removed for the first time and she realized that she had no vision in her eye at all, only darkness. After receiving medication for the pain and nausea, she was brought back to her retina surgeon’s clinic, where a sonogram revealed a large amount of debris.

The debris was a severe staph infection. The fellow at the clinic drained her eye and injected an antibiotic to treat it, but the long-term damage to her optic nerve was already done. At the urging of multiple doctors, she agreed to undergo a second, corrective surgery, but it did not help her vision and only put her through weeks more of pain and severe spikes in eye pressure. Scans show that the infection and subsequent spikes in pressure destroyed 75 percent of her optic nerve.

Patricia’s quality of life is greatly affected by her injury: “I cannot see anything clearly with that eye, no matter how close it is. I cannot see to use my iPhone, or see my computer monitors, or read anything. I cannot even see my five-month-old granddaughter’s face. My only grandchild.”

The injury resulted in permanent disability and forced her to leave her job as a paralegal, which she enjoyed and excelled at for many years. Her whole life has been turned upside down.

Meanwhile, her surgeon has showed no sympathy or remorse. Despite many visits back to the clinic, she only ever saw him after she requested to speak with him. He told her “it happens,” with regard to the infection, and said “What do you want me to do? There is nothing else we can do for you,” when she continued asking questions to see if her blindness could be improved. She has never received an apology or acknowledgement of the severity of her injury.

Patricia has spoken with several attorneys, seeking accountability and compensation for what happened to her. However, none will take her case because of California’s outdated $250,000 cap on medical malpractice damages. The surgeon’s lawyer has rejected a pre-litigation settlement, so she will not receive any compensation for her injury.

She supports the Fairness for Injured Patients Act because she wants to prevent something like this from happening to others.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Screen Shot 2021-06-14 at 3.12.08 PM

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Patricia McMillan appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Shawn Rial https://patientsforfairness.org/shawnrial/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=shawnrial Mon, 10 Feb 2020 11:35:00 +0000 http://34.218.81.217/?p=1138 After a failure to run a blood test during chemotherapy, 20-year-old Shawn dies of an infection, his immune system too weak to fight it.

The post Shawn Rial appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

 

 Share Shawn’s Story
Facebook Share Button

Shawn Rial had testicular cancer, the most treatable form of cancer, and a projected 90 percent chance of success through chemotherapy. That’s why his family was horrified when he slipped into a coma only a week after beginning treatment. 

Shawn’s diagnosis of cancer at the age of 19 did not stop him from making plans to pursue a degree in music. The drums were his passion. At the age of fourteen, he worked diligently for an entire summer to save up for his first kit. He later began to mix his own music and was on the verge of attending music school. Shawn found happiness in his love for music—a happiness that radiated to his family and anyone who spent time around him. He was a spark of life. He loved to see people laugh and worked hard to put a smile on everyone’s face. 

When Shawn was diagnosed with Stage II testicular cancer, he and his family were hopeful. He had the tumor removed and, after his first week of chemotherapy, he felt good. He hadn’t even begun to lose his hair. Everyone was confident that he was safely headed towards remission. 

A week after that first round of inpatient treatment, Shawn went to an outpatient facility to receive his second round of chemotherapy. The next day, when his father invited him to join the family for a trip to the desert, Shawn told them to go ahead, he was going to stay back and spend time with his grandmother. 

After only one day in the desert, Shawn’s father, William, got a call that his son had been rushed to the hospital with serious leg pain and severe discomfort.  

He was admitted to the hospital with a 0.01 white blood cell count, perilously below the standard 3.8-10.8 range. His body had no resources to fight against infection.

It was clear to the hospital doctors that the outpatient facility had failed to give him a standard and crucial test to check on the level of his white blood cells. Had the test indicated a low count, which is common during chemotherapy treatment, he would have been given Neupogen, a drug that restores the count by generating young white blood cells. 

But the provider at the outpatient facility had not taken the thirty seconds that were necessary to complete the routine blood test. Instead, he sent Shawn home in critical danger of infection.  

Shawn’s dad never spoke to his son again. By the time William reached the hospital, Shawn was already in a coma—his body was unable to combat an infection and had swelled to three times its normal size.  

William Rial had to make the most heartbreaking decision of his life—to let his son pass in peace. Shawn died on February 17th, 2010, eight days after falling into a coma and just two weeks after starting chemotherapy treatment. He had turned twenty only a month before. “It hurts today as much as it did on the day. That was the hardest thing I had to do is tell the doctors ‘stop, let him go.’ It haunts me every night,” William said ten years after Shawn’s passing. 

It took three years to bring the case to the courts. Because of the cap on compensation for victims of medical negligence, William Rial was lucky to have even found a lawyer willing to take it on. To pay for the lawyer, the investigation, and the professional witnesses essential in a case like theirs, William and his family were risking everything in order to begin to seek justice for Shawn and accountability from the medical providers who failed to give him adequate attention and care. 

A unanimous jury awarded $2 million to Shawn’s family. But when the jury left the room, the judge was obligated to override the jury and slash compensation to $250,000 because of California’s 1975 cap that has never been adjusted for inflation. 

It was barely enough to pay for the case. “You’re scared of losing your house if you don’t win” describes William. 

And it was not enough to make the medical providers change their practices. The cap is so low that there is little incentive for facilities or insurance companies to hold negligent doctors accountable for their actions. The provider that failed to run a simple blood test that would have saved Shawn’s life continues to practice without penalty. 

When William Rial talks about what happened to Shawn, he feels his loss as acutely as he did the day Shawn passed. He believes it is time for the law to change. “I have to be accountable; I have to be responsible,” says William. The medical professionals and insurance companies “have to be accountable and they have to be responsible too for what they do, for their actions. Nobody should have to bury their child for a mistake that is so simple and nobody should have to risk property and financial demise in order to pursue justice.” 

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Shawn Rial appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Lorraine Cano https://patientsforfairness.org/lorrainecano/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lorrainecano Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:30:00 +0000 https://www.patientsforfairness.org/?p=17748 Lorraine lost her life after a botched elective heart procedure. A law that hasn’t changed since 1975 means there is no accountability when an elderly person is killed by medical negligence. Her daughter is fighting to change that.

The post Lorraine Cano appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

Lorraine Cano was living a joyful life as a vibrant senior. She devotedly walked her two little chihuahuas at the park every day. She enjoyed dining at home, and going out for meals with family. A mother of six and married for over 61 years, she had always been involved in her children’s and grandchildren’s lives and was supportive of their diverse interests. She was an encyclopedia of music and lyrics and loved to sing. 

 

She and her daughter Rachelle were best friends. They went on vacations together and Lorraine especially loved their road trip to Jackson, Wyoming with the chihuahuas. Rachelle describes her mother as intelligent, funny, lighthearted, and loving.   

When Lorraine was diagnosed with a coronary artery blockage in 2018, she opted to have an elective procedure to fix it. She took her time selecting the most qualified doctor to do the job. Her main cardiologist said she did not necessarily need the procedure since her blood-flow had naturally re-routed and she was asymptomatic of heart disease, but she wanted to make the best decision for her longevity.  

 

The doctor that was recommended was charismatic and convincing. He held Lorraine’s hands and said, “I can fix this. Look at you, you’re beautiful!” He told her how young she looked for her age and that she should take care of the blockage so she could “live to 100.”  

 

Lorraine and Rachelle arranged to have the procedure done by this doctor because they trusted him. He was known to be one of the best interventional cardiologists on the west coast. Rachelle specifically informed the hospital via email and phone call that they did not want anyone else to touch the tools, or perform the procedure – no trainees or students. She was reassured by the clinic staff that only the doctor would be the main operator and they rescheduled for the following week.  

During the procedure, Rachelle and other family members sat nervously in the waiting area. She looked up and noticed their doctor out in the lobby, speaking with other patients’ families. She and her family thought that was strange and wondered if her mother’s procedure was over, but he didn’t come over to tell her how it went. They waited and worried.  

 

After a much longer wait than anticipated, a different doctor approached her and exclaimed “I fixed the leak!” Confused, Rachelle asked what he was talking about, but her questions were brushed off. Then he said her mother was in the ICU.  

 

That evening during rounds in the ICU, Rachelle asked the surgeon point-blank, “Did you perforate her artery?” He responded that he had. “It happens all the time,” he said. He attempted to reassure her that perforation was “very common.” But Rachelle knew from her research that this wasn’t true.  

 

Later that night Lorraine’s heart was racing. They learned the injury had caused a permanent irregular heartbeat along with symptoms of congestive heart failure. She had several broken ribs as a result of fifteen minutes of CPR. She acquired stage 3 kidney failure due to disrupted blood-flow. Still, no one had provided them details of the error in the operating room, nor of a heart attack Lorraine had on the operating table. Her ribs ached from the CPR she had received but no one ordered an x-ray in ICU. 

The hospital rushed to send her home despite Lorraine’s new and serious symptoms that could cause fatal complications. Just five days after the botched surgery, the hospital released Lorraine without any referrals. The broken ribs were confirmed several days after the procedure, after a hospitalist finally gave in to the family’s request for an x-ray.  

 

This was the start of a long and tumultuous journey for Lorraine and her family. They were devastated and felt betrayed by their doctor. They had hired the expert to prevent this kind of outcome. 

 

In the shocking aftermath of the days to follow, Lorraine and Rachelle realized the doctor who had exclaimed that he “fixed the leak” was probably who had attempted the procedure. He was only in training for, and did not yet specialize in, interventional cardiology.  

 

Rachelle later recorded a conversation with her mother about the incident. She asked her mother what she would like the surgeon to know. Lorraine said, “What about your Hippocratic oath? Didn’t that mean anything to you? You just threw me aside to a person that didn’t even know enough, was not skilled enough. I had the most confidence in you… Now I’m just living from day to day, and there are so many problems with my heart. I no longer have a normal, working heart.”  

 

After months of immense suffering and trauma, Rachelle found a cardiologist herself, at an out-of-state hospital, who performed a successful procedure to restore Lorraine’s cardiac rhythm. She was finally in stable condition and recovering. Rachelle took care of her mother as best she could. Lorraine miraculously began to regain her strength, enough to start enjoying life again.  

Then,  in  February of 2021, Lorraine developed abdominal pain out of the blue and lost her appetite. They went to the emergency room. 

Despite the diagnosis of stage 3 kidney failure in Lorraine’s medical records, she was given a contrast dye to improve x-ray image visibility. Dye is known to be toxic to patients with unhealthy kidneys. The doctor had also gambled on a potent antibiotic medication known to cause pancreatitis in some elderly people. Both proved lethal for Lorraine. 

The medical staff failed to treat her in a timely fashion. There was no sense of urgency and Rachelle had to monitor her mother’s care herself. She felt helpless. By the time they started dialysis, it was too late. Lorraine slipped into a semi-vegetative state. 

After years of supporting her mother through injury and recovery, Rachelle could do nothing now. She held her mother’s hands and sung to her as she passed.  

Rachelle never wants another elderly parent to go through the needless pain that her mother did in her last years of life. She is seeking justice for what happened to her, but is up against California’s nearly 50-year-old cap on damages in medical malpractice cases. Under the current CA law, it is difficult to find an attorney to take the case.  

Lawyers have told Rachelle they cannot afford to take cases like hers because even if they win, the cost of bringing it outweighs any possible outcome under the cap. According to the outdated law, Lorraine’s life had no value because of her age. If Rachelle wants access to justice, she will have to pay the cost herself, upfront. Filing the case alone will cost $20,000. 

Only when the law is changed will injured patients be able to have their cases heard in California. Rachelle is advocating for change, for her mother and for all victims of medical malpractice, by supporting the Fairness for Injured Patients Act. 

“My mom loved life,” Rachelle says. “I refuse to accept that it was ‘her time’ just because she was an elderly patient. When a person dies as a result of medical error, it is a premature death, no matter the patient’s age.”  

 

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Lorraine Cano appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>
Patricia McMillan https://patientsforfairness.org/patriciamcmillan/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=patriciamcmillan Sat, 18 Jan 2020 17:00:00 +0000 https://patientsforfairness.org/?p=17846 Insufficient preventative and post-operative care lead to a severe staph infection in Patricia’s eye, causing permanent blindness.

The post Patricia McMillan appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>

Share Patricia’s Story
Facebook Share Button

Patricia McMillan was enjoying her work as a paralegal and looking forward to the arrival of her first grandchild when she was diagnosed with an epiretinal membrane, a common eye condition that can impair vision if left untreated. Her vision was 20/20 with corrective lenses, but she elected to have a routine corrective procedure to prevent potential future impairment. She was encouraged and reassured by her retina surgeon. On the day of the surgery at a renowned eye institute in the San Diego area, Patricia was rushed through pre-op. The surgeon never came by to speak with her. She awoke mid-surgery, terrified, as the anesthesia had not been administered properly. Someone noticed she was awake and held her hand.

After the procedure, she was told the surgery went well. Still affected by the anesthesia, she was barely coherent, but they encouraged her to get dressed and leave.

By evening the next day, Patricia suddenly developed an excruciating headache and eye pain, and began vomiting. Her eye was constantly watering. These symptoms were mentioned in her discharge instructions as serious enough to call the emergency number provided by the optometrist. She called, but the clinic told her that she should wait until her appointment in the morning the next day. She tried to hold out, but the pain was so severe that she decided to go to the emergency room.

In the ER, her eye shield was removed for the first time and she realized that she had no vision in her eye at all, only darkness. After receiving medication for the pain and nausea, she was brought back to her retina surgeon’s clinic, where a sonogram revealed a large amount of debris.

The debris was a severe staph infection. The fellow at the clinic drained her eye and injected an antibiotic to treat it, but the long-term damage to her optic nerve was already done. At the urging of multiple doctors, she agreed to undergo a second, corrective surgery, but it did not help her vision and only put her through weeks more of pain and severe spikes in eye pressure. Scans show that the infection and subsequent spikes in pressure destroyed 75 percent of her optic nerve.

Patricia’s quality of life is greatly affected by her injury: “I cannot see anything clearly with that eye, no matter how close it is. I cannot see to use my iPhone, or see my computer monitors, or read anything. I cannot even see my five-month-old granddaughter’s face. My only grandchild.”

The injury resulted in permanent disability and forced her to leave her job as a paralegal, which she enjoyed and excelled at for many years. Her whole life has been turned upside down.

Meanwhile, her surgeon has showed no sympathy or remorse. Despite many visits back to the clinic, she only ever saw him after she requested to speak with him. He told her “it happens,” with regard to the infection, and said “What do you want me to do? There is nothing else we can do for you,” when she continued asking questions to see if her blindness could be improved. She has never received an apology or acknowledgement of the severity of her injury.

Patricia has spoken with several attorneys, seeking accountability and compensation for what happened to her. However, none will take her case because of California’s outdated $250,000 cap on medical malpractice damages. The surgeon’s lawyer has rejected a pre-litigation settlement, so she will not receive any compensation for her injury.

She supports the Fairness for Injured Patients Act because she wants to prevent something like this from happening to others.

Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death.  Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.

Meet more patients

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

Click the map to view stories by Senate District

A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.

Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)

The post Patricia McMillan appeared first on Meet the California Families Fighting for Injured Patients.]]>